GB
  
You are currently viewing the United Kingdom version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
6 MIN READ TIME

Threats to Science in Ukraine

ANASTASIIA LUTSENKO

Against the backdrop of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the scientific community grapples with unprecedented challenges. Many researchers face displacement and resource constraints. Yet amid adversity, there is an opportunity for Ukraine to transform its scientific inf rastructure, potentially positioning itself as a key player in technological innovation. Recognizing the historical echoes of intellectual exodus underscores the delicate balance between scientific pursuit and survival. As Ukraine navigates these complexities, the restoration and preservation of its scientific foundation emerge as crucial components for national recovery and future prominence on the European technological stage.

With the onset of the current phase of the Russo-Ukrainian war, numerous accounts highlight the challenges faced by scientists who have had to relocate, often saving not only their families but also valuable specimens and scientific collections. Stories abound, such as Olga Malyuta’s evacuation of a sperm bank and Marina Shkvirya’s efforts to evacuate bears, rescued f rom circuses and illegal private zoos, to Western Ukraine and Germany. The war unquestionably poses a significant threat to natural ecosystems, inflicting extensive losses directly through combat actions and indirectly by severely disrupting existing ecosystems. This disruption leads to irreparable losses among endangered animal species. Making matters worse, many of Ukraine’s universities can only operate virtually (Suchikova and Tsybuliak 2023).

Concurrently, scientists who chose to remain in Ukraine are navigating complex conditions characterized by online work, blackouts, power outages, and the inability to conduct experiments under normal circumstances. Ornithologists, for instance, find their fields and forests littered with land mines, while those who study the Black Sea face impediments to quality monitoring. These accounts underscore the resilience and dedication of scientists working under adverse conditions, emphasizing the need for comprehensive support and strategic initiatives to sustain and revitalize scientific endeavors in Ukraine.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue March/Apr 2024
 
£2.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription £16.99 billed annually
Save
5%
£2.83 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
March/Apr 2024
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editorial
A Skeptical Hero’s Origin Story
[ FROM THE EDITOR
COLUMNS
Skeptical Heroes Unite: CSICon 2023
The first CSICon I attended was in Nashville
The Highs and Lows of Skeptical Education
Stephen Hupp Asa psychologist and former college professor,
What I Learned: Disgust, Misinformation, and the Lemon Test
Erika Engelhaupt CSICon 2023 has come and gone,
The Third Time Was Filled with Charm
Dave Farina. Image Credit: Adrienne Hill CSICon 2023
The Lies We Share
Richard Wiseman, Teller, and Penn Jillette Lies are
Come for the Speakers, Return for the Community
Come for the speakers, return for the community—that
Defending Science against Social Justice Dogmatism and Identitarianism
Robyn E. Blumner is president and CEO of
Detective’s Sidekick: Remembering My Late Wife, Diana Harris
Joe Nickell, PhD, has used his training at
The Mystery of the Vegetable Lamb
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal,
Feng Shui, Demarcation, and Virtue Epistemology
Massimo Pigliucci is the K.D. Irani Professor of
Rhinos and Radium: A Skeptic’s Tour of Paris, Part II
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of
The MH370 Teleport Hoax
Mick West is a writer, investigator, and debunker
There Be Monsters! Is it True We’ve Only Explored 5 Percent of the Oceans?
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the
FUN & GAMES
Find 3 groups of 3 connections... RIDDLER KENT
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
UFO Whistleblowers Mick West’s sobering assessment (“UFO Whistleblowers
SECRETS REVEALED
IN THIS ISSUE … Connectivity Answer Group #1:
INTERVIEW
Why Weird Stuff Matters: Chris French on The Science of Weird Shit
Chris French, professor emeritus of psychology at Goldsmiths
FEATURED ARTICLES
Stories That Should Be Handled with Care: The Subjects of Pseudoscience
\ Editor’s Note: This article includes two
Prophet of Oppenheimer’s Atomic Bomb
Did a hillbilly prophet foretell the development of
Fitspiration, Pseudo-Healthcare Professions, and the First Amendment
There have been a handful of recent court
Why You Will Never Know What ‘Healthy Eating’ Is
Amazon lists 60,000 books under the search term
REVIEWS
Healthy Skepticism about Wellness Culture
The Gospel of Wellness is the book I
A Foolproof Defense against Misinformation?
“Raphael notes how wellness culture offers opportunities
Skeptical Inquirer
Scientific and Technical Consultants
Gary Bauslaugh, writer and editor, Victoria, B.C., Canada